Innovation through subtraction

It is difficult to see opportunities consequent upon the dire economic outlook. What might be good for children will be bad for somebody else, whether in terms of jobs or salary or simply having to work in a different way.

In the public sector the word ‘efficiency’ has been devalued. Politicians regularly talk about efficiency as an alternative to ‘cuts’. Generally the promise outstrips the reality.
In business, efficiency is routine. A good business will continually look to deliver more product at the same cost, or the same volume of product at less cost. Annual efficiencies of less than 5% are frowned upon. Some businesses, Tesco and Toyota for example, have established reputations for their methods for finding efficiency. Kamban, an approach honed by Taiichi Ohno, is one of the core components of Toyota’s 50-year rise from sewing machine manufacturer to the world’s largest car producer. There is similar potential in the world of children’s services, as illustrated by the following three examples.

Now the election is upon us in the UK, conversations about cutting public sector services will begin in earnest. These will not be happy conversations. Many children and families will receive less support. Many people will loose their jobs.

Children’s services -health, education, social care, police and youth justice- are about to experience huge financial cut-backs. Some might argue the biggest cuts ever are upon us.

Now that the General Election is upon us in the UK, conversations about cutting public sector services will begin in earnest. These will not be happy conversations. Many children and families will receive less support. Many people will lose their jobs.

Children’s services -health, education, social care, police and youth justice- are about to experience huge financial cut-backs. Some might argue the biggest cuts ever are upon us.